Electrical Safe Work Practices 2024 NFPA 70E Online Training


Balancing Maintenance Strategies for Asset Reliability and Operational Performance

As you know, selecting the best maintenance strategies is crucial for maximizing efficiency, minimizing downtime, and extending the lifespan of equipment.

Primary strategies include predictive, preventive, corrective, and run-to-fail maintenance. Additionally, online condition monitoring has revolutionized how maintenance is approached.

Let’s delve into each of these strategies, explore their benefits and drawbacks, discuss how to balance them effectively to achieve optimal results, and consider the sustainability implications of each approach.

Understanding the Types of Maintenance Strategies

Predictive Maintenance

Predictive maintenance involves monitoring equipment conditions during regular operation to predict when maintenance should be performed. This approach relies on real-time data and advanced analytics to foresee equipment failures before they occur. With sensors and sophisticated data analysis tools, predictive maintenance can intervene at just the right moment.

Benefits of Predictive Maintenance

  • Reduce Downtime
  • Cost Savings
  • Improved Efficiency

The initial investment in technology and training can be noticeable, but the long-term benefits often justify the cost. Predictive maintenance has substantially increased in the manufacturing, energy, and transportation industries.

Take manufacturing, for instance. Vibration analysis can detect wear in motor bearings early, while thermal imaging in energy sectors can identify electrical system anomalies before they cause failures. These proactive measures save you money and enhance efficiency and safety.

Preventive Maintenance

On the other hand, preventive maintenance is a proactive approach involving regular, scheduled maintenance activities to prevent equipment failures. This strategy is based on time or usage intervals rather than the condition of the equipment. If you need to address potential issues early, preventive maintenance enhances equipment reliability and prevents unexpected breakdowns. It simplifies planning and budgeting for maintenance activities. However, because it needs to account for the actual condition of the equipment, it sometimes results in unnecessary maintenance.

Benefits of Preventive Maintenance:

  • Increased Equipment Lifespan
  • Reduced Failure Risk
  • Improved Budget Management

Industries like healthcare, food and beverage, and aerospace rely heavily on preventive maintenance. In healthcare, for example, regular calibration and servicing of medical devices ensure patient safety and equipment reliability.

Corrective Maintenance

Corrective or reactive maintenance involves repairing or replacing equipment after a failure. This strategy focuses resources on actual equipment failures, simplifying maintenance planning since you only take action when something goes wrong. While it can reduce your need for extensive monitoring tools, the potential for unexpected downtime and operational disruption can be significant.

Benefits of Corrective Maintenance:

  • Immediate Problem Resolution
  • Resource Optimization
  • Simplified Planning

Mining, construction, and utilities often rely on corrective maintenance. For instance, machinery is repaired on-site in mining after it breaks down, while power is restored after an electrical outage in utilities.

Run to Failure Maintenance:

Run-to-fail, or run-to-failure maintenance, is a strategy where your equipment is used until it breaks down, and then repairs or replacements are made. This approach is suitable for non-critical or easily replaceable equipment, eliminating the need for regular maintenance activities and reducing immediate maintenance costs. However, the sustainability implications of increased waste and resource consumption must be considered.

Benefits of Run-to-Failure Maintenance:

  • Low Initial Cost
  • Simplicity
  • Maximized Asset Use

Industries such as consumer goods, agriculture, and retail use this strategy. Non-critical packaging machines in consumer goods industries are often run until they fail, and in agriculture, non-essential tools are used until they break.

Balancing Maintenance Strategies

When selecting the right maintenance strategy, you must balance several factors, including the equipment’s criticality, cost considerations, and the impact of downtime.

  • Maintenance Strategies for Critical Equipment: Critical equipment that impacts production should have a robust maintenance strategy, such as predictive or preventive maintenance.
  • Maintenance Strategies for Non-Critical Equipment: Non-critical equipment can be managed with run-to-fail or corrective maintenance to reduce costs.

Executing a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis is essential to evaluating the costs associated with each maintenance strategy, including implementation, monitoring, and potential downtime. These costs must be balanced against the benefits of reduced downtime and extended equipment lifespan. Additionally, consider the impact of equipment downtime on overall production and operations. Predictive maintenance is particularly valuable in minimizing unexpected downtime for critical systems.

For instance, a manufacturing plant might use predictive maintenance for its production line motors, reducing unexpected failures and improving efficiency. A hospital might employ preventive maintenance for its medical devices, ensuring patient safety and equipment reliability. Conversely, a mining company could opt for corrective maintenance for its haul trucks, focusing resources on immediate repairs when needed.

Utilization of Online Condition Monitoring

Online condition monitoring involves using sensors and IoT technology to continuously monitor equipment health in real-time. This approach provides valuable data that can be integrated with various maintenance strategies. Real-time data offers immediate access to equipment status and performance metrics.

At the same time, predictive insights enable early detection of potential issues through data analysis, reducing downtime results from prompt maintenance actions based on accurate condition monitoring. Online condition monitoring is the backbone of predictive maintenance, providing the data needed for accurate predictions.

It can also enhance preventive maintenance by optimizing maintenance schedules based on actual equipment conditions. Even for corrective maintenance, real-time alerts from condition monitoring can speed up response times. For run-to-fail strategies, condition monitoring can track performance and plan the replacement of non-critical equipment.

For example, an oil refinery might implement online condition monitoring for its pumps, preventing failures and optimizing maintenance schedules. A logistics company could use condition monitoring for its fleet, reducing breakdowns and improving delivery reliability.

Sustainability Considerations

Sustainability in maintenance strategies involves reducing waste, conserving resources, and minimizing environmental impact.

  • Predictive maintenance contributes to sustainability by extending the life of equipment and reducing the need for spare parts, thus minimizing waste.
  • Preventive maintenance ensures equipment runs efficiently, reducing energy consumption and emissions.
  • Corrective maintenance can be less sustainable due to the potential for increased downtime and resource usage, but it can be managed by prioritizing repairs and replacements with environmentally friendly practices.
  • Run-to-fail may seem unsustainable due to equipment failure, but it can be balanced by recycling and responsibly disposing of failed components. Integrating online condition monitoring supports sustainability by optimizing maintenance activities and preventing excessive resource use.


Selecting the best maintenance strategy for production equipment is a complex but essential task. Start in the CAPEX project’s early stage by analyzing Total Cost of Ownership (TCO). Your organization can optimize its maintenance efforts by understanding the advantages and limitations of predictive, preventive, corrective maintenance, and run-to-fail and leveraging online condition monitoring. Balancing these strategies based on equipment criticality, cost considerations, and downtime impact ensures efficient and reliable operations.

Furthermore, sustainability in maintenance practices can significantly enhance operations’ overall efficiency and environmental footprint. As technology continues to evolve, the future of maintenance strategies will likely see even greater integration of real-time data and advanced analytics, leading to smarter and more proactive maintenance approaches.

A well-balanced maintenance strategy is key to maximizing equipment performance and minimizing operational disruptions, ensuring long-term success and resilience in maintenance practices. SEAM Group offers comprehensive solutions tailored to your needs to help you achieve this balance. We are willing to share our case studies, in which our clients optimized operational strategies with us to achieve better results in safety, availability, and cost.

Call 866.772.6770 for more information.

Explore these topics

Related Content

Stay Informed

Stay ahead of the curve with our latest insights, strategies, and news.